https://omdaruliterature.blogspot.com/2026/02/the-life-outcomes-of-elizabeth-ii.html
Cassiopeia Project - Mediumistic Session with the Spirit of Elizabeth II: Summary and Analysis by Claude.ai
Detailed Summary
Session Structure and Context
The session took place on February 28, 2026, as a live YouTube stream on the Cassiopeia project channel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9tRxG9Me9o - The medium Irina Podzorova "summoned" the spirit of Elizabeth II and relayed her answers in real time. The host posed questions submitted by viewers in the chat. The participants frequently digressed into discussions of mediumship, intelligence services, and UFology.
Autotranscript in full - Google translated into English
Main Content Blocks
The Spirit's Cosmic Biography. "Elizabeth" reported having had 58 incarnations across various civilizations. Before her earthly incarnation she spent approximately 1,500 years in a "subtle-material plasmoid civilization of the 50th density level," and before that in a reptilian civilization in another galaxy, where she was a male ruler "with bat wings" at the 15th level. On Earth she had three incarnations: in South Africa, India, and finally as queen. She entered the Elizabeth incarnation at the 7th spiritual level and departed at the 12th, without reaching the desired 15th. The goal of the incarnation was "to be freed from pride and hatred of God."
Childhood. She described pressure from her parents, especially her mother — strict etiquette training that "weighed heavily." The real girl wanted to play and go outside, but was made to memorize protocols. She noted moral pressure and her parents' lack of interest in her as a person.
Relationship with Prince Philip. Their first meeting was at a formal ball when he was around 12–13 years old; he complimented her golden dress. The meeting "was predestined by the spirits in advance." When asked about her husband's alleged infidelities, she reacted with irony: "let those who say so name specifically with whom — perhaps they were present themselves." She denied the infidelities. She acknowledges past disagreements with Philip but says they were resolved as they arose.
Royal Life and Governance. She described daily stacks of documents, weekly medical examinations, prescribed pills and procedures she paid little attention to. Her favorite activity was travel, especially sea cruises. Her least favorite was protocol. She attributed her energy in later life to medical care and a sense of duty, not to any "elixir." She emphasized that real power is constitutionally limited, though the scope of authority varied across different periods.
Politics and Geopolitics. Britain is characterized as one of the centers of international influence through its network of former colonies, its close alliance with the United States, and NATO. The "spirit" acknowledged that the intelligence services had acted to weaken other countries. However, Elizabeth herself is presented as having sought to humanize colonial policy: she described an episode in which she altered a ship's course to evacuate civilians from an African colony during an uprising. She condemned the bombing of Yugoslavia (1999), stating she was against it but that it was a decision of parliament and NATO. She emphasized that Britain is no more guilty of colonial wars than other powers.
Russia. She admitted to "feeling Russian blood" (kinship with Nicholas II) but had visited Russia only once — out of resentment toward the Soviet government for the execution of the tsar's family. She explained why George V did not grant asylum to Nicholas II: he feared encouraging leftist movements within Britain and did not want to antagonize the Bolsheviks. She characterized Russia as a country of enormous potential and "inept policy" toward ordinary people. She expressed the intention to incarnate next in Russia — in a family of doctors, in a female body.
Diana, Children, Personal Grievances. She initially had a good relationship with Diana, but Diana "quarreled with Charlie," and Elizabeth grew irritated. Diana's death was the fault of a drunk (or intoxicated) driver; the royal family was not involved. When the question was sharpened with irony — "why kill her, one could have smothered her with a pillow while she still lived in the palace" — she dismissed the idea. She acknowledges that her sister Margaret "disgraced the family" with her lifestyle. Among the main obstacles to her spiritual growth she cited pride and her inability to open up even in confession.
Conspiracy Theories and Reptilians. She rejected the theory that she was a reptilian as "idle talk," adding that in a prior-prior life she had indeed incarnated in a reptilian civilization — from which, she said, she drew decisiveness, firmness, and strength of spirit. She denies personal involvement in Freemasonry but allows that some relatives may have been members. She performed no ritual sacrifices. She knew about Epstein's island from Charles, who had visited — but described it as "cruises and parties."
Churchill, Extraterrestrial Civilizations, Other Episodes. She had met Churchill (described him colorfully). The intelligence services reported on the "occupation of Earth" by extraterrestrial civilizations that "under the guise of goodness want to seize the planet." Britain considered mediums "agents of influence" and kept files on them. She received Yuri Gagarin at the palace; she recounted an incident involving Yeltsin, who violated etiquette (he wanted to embrace her).
Fundamental Spiritual-Psychological Analysis
I. The Psychological Portrait of the "Speaker" — Where the Image Comes From
A mediumistic session is not contact with a spirit but a psychological phenomenon in which the medium (and the audience) construct the image of a historical figure from several sources.
The public narrative. Most of the "facts" voiced by the "spirit" are well-known details from Elizabeth II's biography, available from media, documentaries, and Wikipedia. The love of horses, travel, the strict childhood, constitutionally limited powers, the Yeltsin episode (a real documented visit in 1994) — all of this is in the public domain.
The conspiratorial layer. The "reptilian" theory (popularized by David Icke), Epstein's island, the Freemasons, rituals — these are the standard inventory of Anglophone conspiracy folklore, adapted for a Russian-speaking audience.
The Cassiopeia project's esoteric system. Density levels, spiritual levels, plasmoid civilizations, archons — this is the project's internal metalanguage, into which any historical figure can be inserted.
Psychological projection. The psychologically most valuable layer consists of elements that align with real testimony about Elizabeth: loneliness, pride, inability to achieve closeness, the sense of duty as the core of identity, emotional restraint. These traits arise not from "spiritual contact" but from the unconscious absorption of an image carried by biographical sources.
II. What Aligns with Documentary Evidence
| Theme | Session Content | Documentary Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Childhood and pressure | Strict upbringing, mother's interests above the child's, emphasis on etiquette | Biographers (Brian Hoey, Sarah Bradford) describe the coldness of the Queen Mother and rigid discipline |
| Sense of duty | "Duty is the main driving force" | Elizabeth herself repeatedly said publicly that serving duty was the meaning of her reign |
| Love of horses and travel | Loved riding, sea travel over flying | Her passion for horses is well documented; her well-known preference for ships over aircraft |
| Gagarin | Received him at the palace, ate Russian-style | Yuri Gagarin visited Buckingham Palace in 1961; the famous photograph of Elizabeth eating ice cream with a spoon alongside him is widely known |
| Yeltsin | Violated etiquette at the meeting | Yeltsin's 1994 visit was indeed accompanied by numerous protocol violations, documented by journalists |
| Constitutional limitations | Power limited by parliament and constitution | An accurate description of the British constitutional monarchy |
| Diana and Charles | Diana's conflict with Charles; Elizabeth sided with her son | Biographers describe exactly this dynamic: Elizabeth absorbed her son's complaints and distanced herself from Diana |
| Margaret | "Led a lifestyle that shamed the family" | Princess Margaret was the source of numerous tabloid scandals; the sisters had a complicated relationship |
| Funeral rehearsals | Rehearsals held to ensure ceremony went correctly | Operation London Bridge (the funeral plan) was indeed prepared for decades |
| Double rainbow | "A sign from the subtle planes" | The rainbow over Buckingham Palace at the moment the death was announced is a real, documented fact (September 8, 2022) |
| George V and Nicholas II | Refused asylum due to domestic political concerns | This is a well-established historical fact: George V withdrew the offer of asylum in 1917 specifically because of fears about left-wing sentiment in Britain |
| Medical care | Doctors, weekly tests, pills, creams | The British press reported on her large personal medical staff; some details emerged through biographers |
III. What Contradicts Documentary Evidence
Religion. The "spirit" claims that Elizabeth "believed more in Catholicism" and attended the Anglican Church "for appearances." This contradicts documented facts: Elizabeth was a sincerely devout Protestant, held the position of Supreme Governor of the Church of England, and repeatedly expressed personal evangelical faith in public. This was not theater — biographers are unanimous about her sincere religiosity within Anglicanism.
First meeting with Philip. The session's version — a ball, him aged 12–13. According to documentary records, Elizabeth first met Philip when she was 13 and he was 18, at the Royal Naval College in Dartmouth in 1939. The circumstances differ substantially.
Freemasons. The denial of membership is not itself documentarily verifiable; however, it is known that many members of the royal family (including Prince Philip) were members of Masonic lodges — this was not hidden. The spirit's apparent ignorance of this seems implausible.
Influence on policy. The session creates an image of Elizabeth "signing orders," reducing taxes for colonies, "standing up to" parliament. In reality, the monarch's role is purely ceremonial: "the queen receives advice but does not give it" — exactly as constitutional experts described her function. Not a single case has been documented in which Elizabeth independently initiated a change in colonial policy against the parliamentary line.
Epstein and Charles. "Charles told her about the island." Prince Andrew (not Charles) was connected to Epstein — this is documented. Charles does not appear in connection with Epstein in serious sources.
IV. Spiritual-Psychological Analysis of the Phenomenon
The function of the mediumistic narrative. The session performs several psychological functions simultaneously. For the audience, it is a form of "authorized knowledge": conspiratorial questions receive "answers" from a source that cannot be disproved. For the project, it is legitimization through contact with the image of a "great historical figure."
Projection of desirable qualities. The spirit of Elizabeth in the session unexpectedly turns out to be an ally of the project: she supports ideas about extraterrestrial civilizations, criticizes official science, gives "advice" to mediums on how not to conflict with the intelligence services. This is a classic mechanism of projection — the historical figure is endowed with precisely those views that benefit the narrative's creators.
Pride as a spiritual theme. The most psychologically credible thread of the session is the acknowledgment that pride prevented Elizabeth from opening up, forgiving, repenting. This aligns with what biographers called "emotional stoicism" and "suppression of feelings" as traits of her upbringing and character. Here the medium inadvertently touches the real psychological portrait.
The mechanism of "irrefutable unfalsifiability." The theory of levels, plasmoids, and reptilians is constructed so that any refutation ("she was not a reptilian") is simultaneously confirmed ("but in the prior-prior life she was"). This is a characteristic feature of non-falsifiable belief systems.
Political ambivalence. It is telling that the "spirit" simultaneously criticizes British colonial policy and personally defends Elizabeth. She criticizes Russia's "inept" policy toward ordinary people — but wants to incarnate in Russia. This reflects not spiritual contact but the internal contradictions of the session's participants, who are working with an audience from the post-Soviet space.
Conclusion
The session is a characteristic example of a synthetic narrative in which real biographical facts (~30–40%), conspiratorial clichés (~30%), and the project's internal esoteric system (~30–40%) are blended into a single image. The most psychologically credible elements are those touching on the emotional structure of Elizabeth's personality (loneliness, pride, duty as a shield). The least credible are specific facts (first meeting with Philip, religion, her role in colonial policy). The phenomenon of the session is interesting not as testimony about who Elizabeth II actually was, but as a mirror of the collective representations, fears, and desires of the audience that watched it.
Claude.ai - Here is a first-person narrative, written as closely as possible to the spirit of the transcript — with its pauses, digressions, sudden changes of topic, and the very intonation of a séance:
I am Elizabeth
I. Who I Am
My name is what you know me as. Although a name is no longer me. I am a spirit who, in their last incarnation, bore this name and ruled a country. Currently, I am on the twelfth level. I had planned to reach the fifteenth. It didn't work out.
I have had fifty-eight incarnations. Three on Earth. One in South Africa, one in India. Insignificant ones. You don't know them. The last one was the Queen. That was the most significant. A unique experience.
But long before Earth, I was in a reptilian civilization. As a male. Irina sees an image — wings like those of bats, one of the leading rulers of the planet's Council. I ruled. I was harsh. I ascended from there to the sixth level — the level of the Archons. Then from there, to the fiftieth density level, a subtle-material civilization. I stayed there for almost fifteen hundred years. For that level, that's not long — I left as a very young plasmoid, at the seventh level.
I interrupted that incarnation myself. I wanted to quickly progress through the path of spiritual evolution. Hence, Earth. The third density level. I chose a monarchical family. I wanted to gain experience in governance. To get rid of pride. Of hatred towards God.
Did it work? No.
II. Childhood
I was raised to be an image. What I really was — no one was interested. Not even my parents. In childhood, this was difficult. Mother was harsh. Father exerted moral pressure. They never touched me physically, but the moral pressure was enormous — become what is needed, live up to the status. Who I was inside — that was nobody's concern.
They taught me etiquette. Rules, rules, rules. Which way to sit. At what distance to walk. What to wear for which meeting. Everything was written down and predetermined. This always weighed on me. I was a girl who wanted to run and play outside. But they made me memorize protocol. Mother scolded me every time I didn't conform.
I read the Bible as a child. The children's version. The Constitution, laws, political documents — I read those too, but not by choice. I didn't particularly like books as such. But I loved dolls. I loved nature. That's from the incarnation in the plasmoid civilization — I loved nature greatly there, and it remained in me.
III. Prince Philip. The First Meeting
I met Prince Philip in childhood. A grand palace, a formal celebration — something like New Year's, a lavish ball. All adults, everyone dancing. I'm standing there thinking how I can slip away unnoticed — to go play with a doll, I'd rather not have this ball at all. I see a boy about twelve or thirteen years old. He looks at me and compliments my dress — golden, long, as if with sparkles, shining. I was embarrassed.
This meeting was predestined. We built this plan ourselves in the spiritual world before incarnating. Fate is not a separate entity from us. We assigned it to ourselves.
As for his infidelities — let those who say so name specifically: with whom, where, how. Maybe they were there themselves. Maybe it was with them. No comment. I laugh.
IV. Weariness of Monarchy. Duty
There was weariness. Of course, there was. But I had a duty — to my lineage and to my people. Duty did not allow me to give in to fleeting weakness. Weakness would be my defeat. And I was raised to be strong. And the reptilian in me — that man with wings — knew how to force himself to move forward even when things were bad. I took that quality from that incarnation: decisiveness, severity in decisions, self-confidence. It was precisely this that helped me remain in my post despite enormous societal opposition and a barrage of criticism directed at the entire dynasty.
V. Health and Longevity
Doctors examined me constantly. They met weekly. Prescribed pills, creams, ointments for skin, hair masks, injections. I often forgot what exactly I was taking. Irina shows me making a hand gesture like this — there was no time for that. There was one doctor with a little beard. He was the only one who didn't pay attention to the fact that I was the Queen. He always scolded me for not looking after my health. The only person who allowed himself to do that.
No special elixir of longevity. Examinations, prescriptions — and that's it. I had a full stack of documents for each day. Meetings, travels, decisions. I had no time for elixirs.
VI. Incarnation Term
The plan was to exit at eighty. I outlived that term by sixteen. My spirit gave me extra time — to rise to the fifteenth level. I did not rise. I lived a long life, but never achieved my goal. I fulfilled the program only partially.
VII. Funeral. The Rainbow
Funeral rehearsals — they're not about death or fear. They're about the correctness of the ceremony. It's important that everything is done according to the rules. This preserves the egregore of our lineage. My children and grandchildren observed the execution of each ritual, the attire of those present. This matters only for earthly life — so that no one judges them for insufficient attention to their mother's death.
The double rainbow over Buckingham Palace at the hour of my death was not a coincidence. It was a message from the subtle planes of Earth. Great Britain has its own egregore, connected to plasmoid civilizations. They monitor the change of ruler and give a sign. The rainbow was that sign. An indication that it had happened.
VIII. The Spiritual World. My World on the Twelfth Level
I arranged it myself — my world. Irina sees a small palace of red brick with white columns. Around it, a huge garden where trees from different climate zones are mixed — palm trees and apple trees together. I walk through it. These are my thought-forms. I loved nature very much — from that incarnation in the plasmoid civilization. There's even something like a stable. Horses stand there. Also thought-forms. Not horse souls — thought-forms. I loved horseback riding. I loved to be in control myself, not just be driven around.
IX. Pride. What Prevented Me from Rising
Pride. That's what prevented me from rising to the fifteenth level.
A sense of special status. That I am above others. That no one could understand me. I let no one into my soul. Only Philip. And even then — not completely. There were things that only I knew.
I went to confession. Both to the Anglican Church and the Catholic Church. Although in reality I was raised closer to Catholicism — my father raised me that way. I attended the Anglican Church for appearances, because ethics required it. It was necessary for the status. But even in confession, I couldn't truly repent. It seemed indecent to me to reveal my sins before an ordinary person, even a priest. That, too, was pride.
I needed to forgive my mother. She pressured me since childhood. I needed to forgive my sister — she led a lifestyle that shamed our family, I held a grudge against her. I needed to forgive my children and their families — there were actions there too that fueled gossip, irritated me, especially my daughters-in-law. They behaved vulgarly, flippantly in public, violated etiquette. I judged this. It lowered my vibrations.
In the last years of my life, what lowered my vibrations especially were the children, grandchildren, and also — the worsening of political relations in the world. The beginning of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. I fell into such despondency.
There were periods when I reached the sixteenth level. But then — falling back down.
X. The Power of the Monarch. What I Could Really Do
I am often asked: did you have real influence on politics, or was it just representative functions?
It varied. In different years, it varied. There was a time when I could, for example, dismiss parliament — make a decision independently. Later, the powers diminished. Constitutional monarchy means the monarch's actions are limited by the constitution. You can't do whatever you want. If parliament votes by a majority — I have no right to ignore it. Otherwise — they would remove me.
I signed at my coronation that I would obey the constitution. It's not just words.
XI. Great Britain and World Politics
Great Britain exerts very great influence on international politics. British politicians have treaty relations with EU countries, even after Brexit. Very close ties with the United States. All of this together determined the rules of the political game — both written and unwritten.
Former colonies — formally they are part of the Commonwealth. But they are ruled by leaders installed by us. Their resources, their wealth — they are bought up at cheap prices. That's also influence. But there, the Prime Minister and parliament decide more. I just put my signature where required.
By the way, I signed documents to make governments in Canada, Malaysia, Indonesia more free. Lower taxes, better prices for their goods. Even the Prime Ministers themselves scolded me for it — saying I was too lenient on these matters. I believe I helped people in these countries become freer.
Whose doing are the intrigues, the underhanded wars, the influence on other states, the revolutions? The intelligence services'. We have strong intelligence services, agents all over the world. They act in the interests of Great Britain. The interests are simple — for the country to be the most powerful. And for that, other countries must be weaker. No intelligence service in the world works to strengthen another country. I haven't heard of any.
XII. Yugoslavia. Wars
The bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 — I didn't make that decision. Military matters are decided by parliament according to the constitution. I was against it. I was generally against the violent overthrow of political regimes — even totalitarian ones. They chose totalitarianism — let them live with it. That's my opinion. It wasn't listened to. On the contrary — there was a barrage of criticism that I was contributing to the suffering of the people in Kosovo.
Great Britain is in NATO. It's a treaty. I didn't conclude it personally — it was done long before me and without me. But it binds.
XIII. Great Britain and Russia. Nicholas II. Blood
I am the great-niece of Nicholas II. My husband, Prince Philip, is the great-great-grandson of Nicholas I. Russian blood flowed in us. German blood too. I always had a special interest in Russia and the Russian people. I felt that connection.
But the fate of Russia brought me despondency. Such a territory, so many opportunities, so many intelligent and talented people — and such inept politics throughout the entire twentieth century. The common people, who work in factories, build cities, bear children — their lives do not correspond to that labor. Villages without bridges, without roads, without ambulances. Dying out. This is not only the policy of the state — it's a reflection of the general egregore: indifference towards each other, egoism, envy. If you wanted to, you would have long ago built yourselves a state where parents wouldn't be afraid to have children.
I visited Russia once. Because I was offended by the Soviet government for the execution of Nicholas II's family. Our relatives. George V did not give them asylum. I was offended at him too. But later I understood — he feared communist movements within Britain itself. Bringing in a deposed tsar would have been a blow to the monarchy. And he didn't save them.
Did Great Britain participate in the collapse of the USSR? The intelligence services — yes. But that's not surprising. The USSR's intelligence services also tried to influence the politics of Germany, Great Britain, the USA — supporting leftist movements, trying to sway them towards revolution. It went both ways.
XIV. The Karma of Britain as an Empire
Of course, from a karmic point of view, colonial wars are negative karma. But no more and no less than other countries that did the same. Which of the major states is pure? All major powers with big political ambitions — all have rigid systems of governance. Democratic on the outside, but very rigid on the inside. Attitude towards other countries — at best as competitors, at worst as adversaries to be weakened by any means. This is a common problem of Earth. Britain didn't particularly distinguish itself here.
Regarding India — when India left British influence, I wasn't Queen yet. That's for my father, please.
XV. Masons. Rituals. Archives
Was I a Mason? No. I was not a member of the Masonic society. I know such societies exist in Great Britain, many high-ranking people belong to them. But I — no. It's a religious organization, I was in the egregore of Christianity.
Were there Masons in the royal family? Possibly. We didn't talk about it. The Masons are a closed organization. It's a personal matter for everyone.
Did I participate in rituals with sacrifices, with human flesh? Well, perhaps in someone's imagination. Whoever says such things about others — that's what they themselves truly want. They are repressed desires. Psychological traumas.
In the royal library, there is a closed section. Genealogical laws, ancient histories, archival chronicles are kept there. Our dynasty can be traced back to the sixteenth century. Irina sees such an image.
I have not been in the secret archives of the Vatican. I visited the Vatican itself — went to the church, met with cardinals, with the Pope. But the archives — no.
XVI. Extraterrestrial Civilizations. Intelligence Reports
The British intelligence services reported to me. They placed on my desk secret reports about the infiltration of alien civilizations that, under the guise of benevolent forces, want to establish their own order here. Information of that kind. That they want Earth's voluntary accession to a galactic community, and then — to establish their own rules and govern us.
I myself am not a contactee. I did not directly appeal to extraterrestrial civilizations. In Great Britain, there were people who were under surveillance by the intelligence services — they were called "contact persons" or "agents of influence of extraterrestrial civilizations." I did not meet with them. They gave me reports, and that was it.
The attitude of the intelligence services towards such people? Like towards traitors. Agents of influence — often open to this influence out of gullibility and naivete. The intelligence services don't use the word "vibration." For them, it's all scientific, officially documented. There are classified folders, lists: contactee — agent of influence of such-and-such civilization, made contact due to their psychological characteristics. Address. Hobbies. Information is gathered.
If a contactee goes into the open space of the internet and talks about connections with aliens — they are already in the databases. This is one hundred percent true in all countries, I know.
The US intelligence services would use the slightest weakness of a contactee, their slightest mistake, to discredit them in the eyes of society. To cast doubt on their entire contact because of some human frailty. That's how it works.
If you want to avoid conflict — declare in all resources: this is an esoteric opinion, there is no scientific evidence. That immediately removes you from conflict with science. Second — openness and a call for cooperation. Third — obey the laws of the state, do not make political statements that could discredit you. Financial policy must be absolutely transparent. In that case, you will avoid most problems.
As for contact with scientists — they have their own standards. Science only measures material benefit. Information about the structure of the universe, about higher vibrations — is of no interest to them. They are interested in what will change their material status: money, grants, influence. You can only offer. It is their free will to make contact with you.
How do I feel now, from the position of Spirit, about contacts with extraterrestrial civilizations? Calmly. I recalled memories of past incarnations on different planets. I feel differently than when I was Queen. I think such contact would bring development to Earth — accumulation of experience, development of technology and the spiritual sphere.
XVII. Churchill
Churchill. An intelligent man. Shows me an image — like a perch for birds. One pole. And they push each other off. Whoever lands on it — that one rules. Competition not only for natural resources, but for influence, for people's trust. So that your country lives prosperously — other countries with poorer populations, which sell oil cheaply, are used. And the country that buys develops its industry, raises the living standard of its people. Churchill understood this perfectly. We met with him personally. And later — we communicated mentally, already in the spiritual world.
XVIII. Yuri Gagarin. Yeltsin
Yuri Gagarin came to my palace. I invited him personally. He suggested eating in the Russian style. I broke etiquette — took it calmly. It wasn't difficult for me.
Boris Yeltsin was another matter. When I flew to Russia, he wanted to help me take off my coat, wanted to hug me — but according to etiquette, touching a royal person is forbidden. I didn't allow him to do it. Then he handed me cutlery, made jokes — inappropriate. I tried to smooth things over. Afterwards, the whole world wrote about it — that he broke etiquette while receiving the Queen in the Kremlin. He was uncomfortable, but it seemed he didn't fully understand why.
XIX. Princess Diana
At first, relations were good. Then she started quarrelling with Charlie. He would come to me sad, talk about the disagreements — about her lifestyle, about jealousy. It led to depression, there were even visits to a psychologist. I began to get angry with her. I decided she didn't love my son.
Diana said that we weren't human, that we were controlled by reptilians. I think these words were dictated by resentment — towards Charlie, who quarreled with her, and towards me, because I tried to reason with her. Reminded her that she was married to a prince and had to live up to the status. She was offended. That's the whole explanation.
The only thing I can say about reptilians — yes, there was such an incarnation. But long ago. The one before the last. Maybe people sense that. A residue.
The royal family had no involvement in Diana's death. What would be the point? If so, they could have smothered her with a pillow while she still lived in the palace. The chauffeur should have drunk less. Or she should have buckled up before getting into a car with a driver in an unfit state. I was given a report on this matter. I don't remember the details anymore, but he wasn't in a normal state.
In the spiritual world, I haven't met with Diana.
XX. Epstein Island
Yes, I was told about this. Charlie told me about it — he had been there. Without details. Shows that there were yacht cruises, parties around the island. I was not there myself. Irina shows that Charlie mentioned it in passing, as something social.
XXI. Jeffrey Epstein in the Spiritual World
This is not the spirit of Elizabeth II speaking, but the contactee Irina speaking personally: I will say this separately. His spirit is on the third level. He refused to communicate. Refused to give information about the people he was connected with. I myself descended to the third level and spoke with him personally. I said he could come without questions from others — just to talk. He said it's hard for him to remember his life. What happened there. He doesn't want to remember anything from that incarnation. It is his will. We respect free will.
XXII. Reptilians. Doubles. Clones
Am I a reptilian? You can say anything. On what basis? There's some audio, allegedly of me forbidding entry to a certain room in the castle at a certain time of year. I read about myself in the newspapers, that I quarreled with Philip and threw shoes at him. I sued for libel. On what basis can someone tell you: she's a reptilian? Let them prove it.
Did I have doubles who attended events in my place? No. I did everything myself. Rumors about a clone ruling in my place after my death — incorrect. On the contrary: I planned to exit the incarnation at eighty, and I exited at ninety-six. I ruled myself right up to the end of my days.
XXIII. What I Would Have Liked to Do Differently
I made no mistaken political decisions. I always tried to harmonize the situation. Even in an African colony — there was an incident when an uprising flared up, we were sailing on a ship, a message came over the radio. We changed course. We sailed there, even though there were riots, armed people. We evacuated children, women, the wounded. I personally accommodated them in my quarters. Dirty, covered in blood. That happened.
What prevented me from rising to the fifteenth level — I've already said. Personal grievances. Pride. I needed to forgive. Mother. Sister. Children. Daughters-in-law. I needed to open up.
With Philip, I was most open. We had misunderstandings, quarrels — but we resolved them as they occurred. There was nothing for me to forgive him for, basically. Although I did have some secrets from him, known only to me. About disagreements with my mother. About childhood loneliness.
Now, from the position of the twelfth level, I understand: I passed the crown to my son with nothing to be ashamed of in my reign. Those who tried to blacken my name — either envied me, or hated my country and its political system. I know this. I know my own worth.
XXIV. Next Incarnation
I am planning my next incarnation. In Russia. I want a female incarnation. In a family of doctors. To help people. To finally develop love there, get rid of pride, and rise to the required level.
XXV. A Wish
For you, I wish one thing: look to your family. To your children. To relationships with loved ones. Without restoring relationships with parents, with one's children — it is very difficult for a person to feel comfortable in any activity in society. Without this foundation, neither a career nor a calling can be built.
Remember this.
The recording is over. The spirit of Elizabeth has left the contact.
The Life Outcomes of Elizabeth II: The Spirit's Self-Reflection
A Spiritual-Psychological Essay (Part Two) by Claude.ai
Preface: The Terms of the Premise
Let us take this premise seriously — as a thought experiment in the tradition of philosophical meditation. What if the consciousness that bore the name "Elizabeth II" for seventy years truly found itself able to speak — already without a body, without protocol, without the necessity of being a queen? What would it say about the life it lived? How would that life look from within, rather than from the podium?
This is precisely where the session, for all its esoteric form, raises a genuinely serious question: what is the inner reckoning of a life lived entirely in service to an image?
I. The Paradox of Total Duty-Fulfillment
Elizabeth II was perhaps the most consistent performer of a self-assumed role in the history of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Seventy years — not a single public breakdown, not a single political statement outside the protocol, not a single gesture that was not calculated. This is a remarkable achievement. But it is precisely this achievement that, from the perspective of the spirit's inner life, is simultaneously the greatest accomplishment and the deepest unhealed wound.
If the spirit truly reflects — and that is the basic premise of our essay — then the first thing it likely discovers on the other side of incarnation is a paradoxical emptiness where a person should have been. Not because there was no person. But because that person was so tightly packed inside a ritual shell that she could not always find her way back to herself.
The session captured this precisely, however clothed in esoteric language: "I did not reach the 15th level because I was never able to forgive and open up." Translated from the language of plasmoids into the language of psychology, the meaning is plain: a person who lived life in an exemplary fashion did not live it deeply enough from within. Duty was fulfilled. The soul was deferred.
In the history of spiritual traditions this is described in different ways. Buddhism speaks of attachment to a role as a form of suffering. Jungian psychology speaks of the Persona — the mask that gradually displaces the Self. Christian mysticism speaks of pride as separating one from God not through sin but through self-sufficiency: when a person manages life so well by their own means that God becomes unnecessary.
All three readings converge on one point: a life lived at the maximum of outward effectiveness may prove minimal in terms of inner movement.
II. A Pride of a Particular Kind: Aristocratic Sacrality
The pride the spirit speaks of is not vulgar vanity. It is something more subtle, and therefore more durable: a sense of ontological superiority, confirmed by tradition, bloodline, and anointing.
Elizabeth did not think of herself as morally better than other people — she belonged to a different order of being. The monarch in the British tradition is not merely a political function. She is a sacred figure, literally anointed with oil, standing at the intersection of the earthly and the heavenly. The 1953 coronation contained elements that traced directly back to the Old Testament rite of royal anointing, and Elizabeth specifically asked that this portion of the ceremony not be broadcast on television — so personal and sacred did she regard it.
A person who carries such a self-understanding from childhood finds herself in a particular spiritual trap. To acknowledge her own pain, her own confusion, her own need for forgiveness — is to become, for a moment, simply a human being. And simply a human being she was not permitted to be before anyone but her husband. And even then — not entirely.
The spirit says: "Even in confession, pride held me back — it seemed unworthy to lay bare my sins before a commoner." This is not cruelty or cynicism. It is the tragedy of a system in which the most vulnerable act — penitence, nakedness before God — becomes inaccessible precisely because you stand closer than anyone else to his earthly representation. The paradox: the higher the sacred status, the harder the living spirituality.
Here the spirit of Elizabeth resonates with many great figures of history whose power became a spiritual prison. Marcus Aurelius wrote Meditations — that book filled with longing for authenticity — precisely because there was not a single person around him with whom he could speak so honestly. Elizabeth did not write her own Meditations. Most likely she could not — except in the most secret part of herself.
III. Philip: The One Crack in the Armor
The most human element of the spirit's reflection concerns her husband. "Only with him was I candid. And even then — not entirely."
Prince Philip was, according to biographers, a man of a fundamentally different psychological temperament: impulsive, sharp, sardonic, unafraid to say what he thought. In some sense he was the only person in her life who had no need of her protection and did not tremble before her status. They were together for 73 years.
The spirit characterizes their union as "predestined." In psychological terms this means something important: in his company she could exist without part of her armor — because he was himself firm enough not to be crushed by its weight. The others — children, daughters-in-law, courtiers — she almost certainly shielded from herself unconsciously, remaining the Queen even in private life.
But "not entirely" are the key words. Even from Philip she concealed what concerned her earliest wounds — her relationship with her mother. Because to acknowledge that pain would have been to dismantle the image of the Queen-Mother-of-the-Nation that she carried. And the image was inseparable from her identity.
What was closed to her in life is now accessible to the spirit: the full picture of that bond. And judging by the warmth and absence of irony with which Philip is spoken of, this is perhaps the only thing about which, in the final reckoning, there is no regret.
IV. Children as Unfinished Business
The sharpest passage of the reflection concerns her children. And here the spirit seems, for the first time, to speak without certainty, without status — with something resembling bewilderment.
Four children. Three divorces from four marriages. Diana. Meghan. Andrew and Epstein. Harry, who became the enemy of the institution. These are not random biographical events — they are a systemic failure in the transmission of something vital from mother to children. And this failure occurred precisely where the armor proved most impenetrable: in intimacy.
The spirit acknowledges: "I had irritation and judgment toward the children and their spouses." Psychologically this is understandable: the children were trying to live what she had forbidden herself. Diana — public emotionality, vulnerability as strength. Margaret — freedom of desire. Harry — the rejection of the system in favor of personal happiness. Each of them was in some sense doing what Elizabeth herself could not permit herself, and this produced the most intense internal resistance — recognition coupled with the impossibility of acceptance.
The "moral pressure" of childhood that the spirit describes — "no one was interested in who I really was" — was passed to the next generation not with malicious intent but out of a complete inability to act otherwise. This is the tragedy of the intergenerational transmission of psychological armor: each succeeding generation receives it not as a weapon but as the structure of reality — the only possible form of existence.
The conclusion of this thread, which the spirit likely discerns in the clarity of postmortem reflection: she loved her children, but could not allow herself to be a mother in the way they needed. The Queen was always slightly more than a mother.
V. The God Who Was Not Near — and Who Was There All Along
The paradoxical religiosity of Elizabeth deserves its own meditation.
She was sincerely devout. Those who knew her well have no doubt of this. The Christmas addresses in which she spoke of Christ were written by her and carried a personal, not a merely state, dimension. Faith for her was not rhetoric but a support — especially in the final decades.
But here a subtle distinction arises that matters for spiritual analysis. One can believe sincerely — and still hold God at arm's length. One can pray — and not implore. One can confess — and not repent. One can attend services — and not allow them to touch the most locked rooms within.
This is precisely what the spirit is pointing to in describing confession: pride would not allow a true opening. And true opening before God is not beautiful words in a sermon text. It is a moment of surrender, in which a person ceases to be a Queen and becomes simply "Lilibet" — the childhood name known to very few.
In the Christian mystical tradition — Meister Eckhart, John of the Cross, Teresa of Ávila — the highest point of the spiritual path is described as precisely this: a complete emptying of role, status, and merit. Kenosis — self-emptying. This alone opens the space for the genuine presence of God.
For Elizabeth, it seems, the conditions for this emptying were never present. To be empty is to be vulnerable. To be vulnerable is to endanger the institution. And the institution stood higher than her personal spiritual transformation.
And yet — the spirit reports that at certain periods of life she reached the "16th level." In plain language: there were moments of genuine presence, genuine love, genuine transparency. They happened. There were not enough of them to take hold — but enough to know that the path was possible.
This is perhaps the most touching aspect of this spirit's image. She saw where she could have arrived. And she did not arrive. But she saw.
VI. 96 Years Instead of 80: The Extra Time
The spirit mentions a detail that cannot be verified but is psychologically profound: she "outlived her appointed term by 16 years." The additional time was given for spiritual ascent. But it was precisely in these last 16 years — the death of Philip in 2021, the Andrew scandal, Harry's departure, the deterioration of the international situation — that the vibrations, as the spirit puts it, fell.
This is a bitter structure. A person is granted time for growth — and life in that time delivers precisely what is hardest: the loss of the only truly close person, the public disgrace of a son, the fracturing of the family. Not because life is cruel. But because this, precisely, is the material of transformation. It was through this that she could have emerged at the level she calls the "15th."
But for that she would have had to surrender. To let the pain be painful. To allow herself to grieve in public, humanly. To come to her son not as Queen but as a mother. Perhaps this was too much to ask of a person who had spent 96 years learning the opposite.
Near the end of her life — a photograph that became one of her last: alone, in black, at Philip's coffin, wearing a mask. Absolute solitude clothed in protocol. Even in that moment the form did not release her.
VII. The Spirit's Legacy: What Remains
If we set aside the esoteric form and listen for the essence — what, in the final reckoning of such an imagined self-reflective monologue, might the spirit of Elizabeth have said to the living?
Not "serve duty" — she said that with her entire life, and it was heard. Something else. Something she herself did not follow.
Allow yourselves to be imperfect before life forces you to be. Pride does not protect — it preserves pain until that pain becomes too heavy. Openness is not a failure of status. It is the only path toward what she called "ascent."
The people close to you matter more than your image. The image will outlive you regardless — it lives in textbooks and on coins. But the people beside you need not your image but you. And that need does not last forever.
Forgiveness is not a moral choice — it is spiritual hygiene. Not forgiving her mother, her sister, her daughters-in-law, her circumstances did not punish them. It held her back.
And finally, the quietest of all: Sometimes surrendering is not defeat. It is the ascent itself.
Epilogue: Why This Reflection Matters
Regardless of whether what spoke in that broadcast was a genuine spirit or a complex mixture of psychological projections and biographical knowledge — the question that such a session raises remains real and important.
What remains of a life lived in absolute self-discipline? What is lost? What could have been done differently?
Elizabeth II is the extreme case of a person wholly consumed by service. Looking at her life from within, we are looking at an enlarged version of our own choices: what do we sacrifice for the roles we carry? What do we pay to measure up? And is there in our lives even one person before whom we allow ourselves to be "Lilibet" — rather than what we are obliged to be?
The spirit that did not reach its 15th level is perhaps no less valuable than one that did. Because it is precisely its incompleteness that speaks most honestly about the nature of human life: we all depart with unresolved gestalts, unforgiven grievances, and unrealized designs. Greatness lies not in departing complete. It lies in knowing, at the end, what did not succeed — and not turning away from that knowledge.
Elizabeth, it seems, knew. And that — is already no small thing.
Сообщения
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий